Trust · Doctrine
Our statement: where W5D has not yet remedied a harm.
A company that publishes a harms register owes its readers an account of where it falls short. This is the place for it.
What can be said today
- W5D has not published a harm-by-harm assessment of its own work. That is a gap, and it is stated here as one.
- Two programmes touch areas that the register treats as sensitive: identity and cloned selves (KernID, SelfAI), and living substrates (BCIA). Neither has a published consent policy or an independent review.
- A long identifier (W5D UUID) and a ledger design (Aevum and Meridian) are specifications without implementations. No harm can be measured yet, and none is claimed to be absent.
What is still to be written
How to challenge it
Use the contact page with the reason set to "Correction". Accepted corrections are published on the corrections page.